The Play’s the Thing: An Interview with Rosten Woo
I think that “creative place-making” as a concept means something very different from when you combine the words “creative” and “place-making”; it is an extremely contested term and contested set of practices. It’s equivalent in some ways to the words “social practice.” It’s bizarre to describe some art as being social practice; this implies that other kinds of art are not social in their construction, which I think lets those other artworks off the hook. Painting is a social practice—but a social practice that is largely organized around producing objects for rich people. That’s social as well. I don’t want to say that everything is everything, but certainly creative place-making is—in the same way we are talking about democratizing the idea of who can be a curator, I’m interested in democratizing who is a creative place-maker. I think the mode in which I am most comfortable working on the idea of place-making is the mode of documentary. I’m interested in working to change the way that people can see a space and, via that specific moment, change the way that the space can grow or what it can become.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122
On behalf of
University of California, Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Sponsored by the Regents of the University of California. Copyright © by the Regents of the University of California.
All rights reserved
ISSN 2151-4712 (print)
ISSN 2372-0751 (online)